Animal control saying ' yes ' to tax dollars, ' go away ' to taxpayers

It struck me as odd that so many animal control agencies in different parts of the country were responding in the same way to public calls for reform: by shooting the messenger.



From my column in SFGate.com:

There's an epidemic spreading through the nation's animal control shelters, and it's not something a vaccination can prevent. It's an epidemic of secrecy.



Consider this: Animal control is a government function, paid for with your tax dollars. It's work done on behalf of the public; shouldn't the public have some way to ensure it's being done appropriately?



But in communities all over the country, including here in California, calls for animal control reform have been met with the sound of a door slamming in the public's face.



[....]



The Central California SPCA, a private organization that holds the animal control contract for the city of Fresno, recently closed its board meetings to the public, sparking a wave of protests, including a July 19 demonstration organized by FixFresno.org, an advocacy group aimed at ending the killing of healthy and treatable pets in the city's shelters.



It's not surprising that citizens want to reform how Fresno's homeless animals are treated; the CCSPCA kills around 80 percent of the pets it takes in, one of the worst kill rates in California and far above the national average of 50 percent.



Recently, animal rescuers in the community have also been alleging mismanagement, abuse and neglect at the shelter.



Until last month, the CCSPCA's board meetings were open to the public, but on June 16, the president of FixFresno.org, Melissa McDonald, received a letter from the shelter's attorney, Jeffrey M. Reid, advising her that the meetings were now closed and members of FixFresno.org would no longer be allowed to attend.



Attendance by FixFresno.org members had been permitted previously, he said, after the group asserted that the board meetings were subject to the Brown Act, California's open meetings law. However, Reid told them this interpretation of the law was incorrect.



He pointed to what is essentially a loophole in the law, which calls for open meetings of private organizations contracted to do government work only in cases where the organization was created specifically to do that work, or if a member of the government sits on the organization's board. Neither of those provisions applies to the CCSPCA.



Members of FixFresno.org showed up at the next board meeting anyway, only to be met at the door by Reid.



"He said that having us there was too 'intimidating' for the board to function," McDonald told me. "It is sad that they chose to hide what is going on instead of addressing the problems."



I called CCSPCA spokesperson Beth Caffrey, and asked what prompted the organization to contact an attorney on this matter in the first place.



"We want our board meetings to be productive," she told me. "We couldn't be productive because of the disruptive behavior of people who were there."

In the rest of the article, I update the situation in Memphis and New York City, and have a great wrap-up commentary from FixAustin.org's Ryan Clinton. It's all here.



Photo: Courtesy of Celeste Pryor.

Comments

[Mary K Chelton]

Doesn't this violate sunshine laws?

[Christie Keith]

Mary, read the article... I spoke with the Fresno city attorney's office and with the New York State Open Government office of the Dept. of State. In the case of Fresno, apparently not. In the case of NYC, apparently yes. In the case of Memphis, my opinion is yes, but they're arguing no, because they say the advisory board is exempt. Some citizens and some journalists are investigating further.

[mary francis]

Thank you for this and the article you wrote for the SF Gate.



Good comments there...one said animal control is about pet owner control. Agreed.



Also the lack of transparency with Animal Control is an indicator for not so subtle losses in our Democracy as a whole.