AB 1634: Are they even pretending anymore?
I was literally speechless when I read the recent revisions made to AB 1634, a proposed California law that would mandate spaying and neutering all dogs and cats by the age of 6 months (previously 4 months).
My fundamental contention is that the proposal is flawed at its core and no amendments, revisions and exemptions can "fix" it, because it won't reduce shelter deaths, which is what it's supposed to do. And these actual revisions and exemptions only make that more clear.
First, it now specifically allows everyone to let their pets have one litter before being altered. Since the AKC reports that the majority of people who register litters with them never have another litter -- are, in other words, not people with an ongoing breeding program or part of the fancy -- and (I choke when I type this, but it's true) puppy mills, pet stores, and mass commercial breeding facilities have always been, and still are, exempt from this bill's provisions, the vast majority of breeding that results in California pets will be unaffected by this bill.
In addition, those who breed pit bulls for dog fighting, as well as people who just don't care about their pets or the laws and ignore licensing and leash laws now, will ignore this law. As will unowned cats, who in some areas are the majority of the animals euthanized in shelters.
So, who's left? Absolutely no one but small hobby breeders, who are the only kind of breeder you should be giving your money to in the first place, and who can never meet the least-discussed but most "poison pill" provision of this bill: the requirement that they obtain a business license.
Currently, small hobby breeders are treated like any sort of very occasional seller, such as someone who holds one or two garage or yard sales each year. They don't have to get licensed as a business, because they aren't a business, any more than someone who has a yard sale is.
Small hobby breeders, those who maintain breeding programs to preserve and improve their chosen breeds, who participate in showing and training their dogs, almost always have their dogs living in their homes and don't have kennels or any kind of commerical facilities, nor do they live in commercially or business zoned areas. They shouldn't be required to get a business license because they are not a "business" in that sense of the word.
The real problem with this bill continues to be that it won't work to accomplish its stated goal. The influx of irresponsibly bred dogs will continue to flow into California, over the Mexican border, from puppy mills, over the Internet, from the black market of dog fighters and irresponsible owners and allowed "one litter" breeders, and out of the pet stores.
And that tiny portion of dog owners who don't contribute to the problem in the first place, the serious small hobby breeders, are the only ones who will get squeezed out of existence. And dogs and cats will continue to die in shelters just as they do today, because there is nothing at all in this bill to stop that.
Way to go, California.

Since apparently AfterElton.com has decided I'm the world's leading lesbian expert on gay male sex scenes, they assigned me to do a movie version of
I used to get my brows and the odd stray hair on my lip waxed at the salon, which I hated and wasn't exactly convenient. Then I found Parissa Wax Strips at Whole Foods Market and I
If you are already an initiate into the wonder and glory that is the "Web's largest shoe store," then you don't need to read this. If not, welcome to my world.
I hear from a lot of people who are steaming mad that good breeders, rescue groups, and shelters have too many restrictions and too long a wait for the kind of puppy they want. And I understand, because we all want what we want and we want it now. That's human nature.
My interview with HGTV's David Bromstad is out on
Recent Comments