- If you have a sick pet or a question on your pet’s health, call your veterinarian.
- If you want your say on food-safety reform, Sen. Durbin’s office wants to hear from you.
- If you’re new to the site, please check out our general information page (includes links to recalled foods).
- If you’d like suggestions on what to feed, click here.
- If you want to report a sick or deceased pet, click here.
I'll be liveblogging the FDA media teleconference here at 4:15 PM Eastern.
Although I believe our technical issues have been resolved, if there are any problems with this site during that time, I'll pick it up on my personal blog at www.doggedblog.com. Please have compassion for my bandwidth over there and DO NOT click on this link until you need to - just save the URL in case you can't get here.
WHAT:
Update on Recall of Pet Foods
WHEN:
Thursday, April 26, 2007, at 4:15 p.m. EDT
MODERATOR:
Julie Zawisza
Assistant Commissioner for Public Affairs, FDA
WHO:
Daniel McChesney, DVM
Director, Office of Surveillance and Compliance
Center for Veterinary Medicine, FDA
Captain David Elder
Director, Office of Enforcement
Office of Regulatory Affairs, FDA
David Acheson, MD
Chief Medical Officer
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, FDA
Kenneth Peterson
Assistant Administrator for Field Operations
Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA
The music playing while we wait to be processed into the teleconference is "Hotel California." It's a jazzy Latin muzak version.
I do have one question - I thought, perhaps incorrectly, that Daniel McChesney was a PhD and not a veterinarian, but he's listed here as "DVM." Does anyone know?
4:23 PM ET, still hasn't begun.
4:30 PM ET, still hasn't started. The music is getting worse, if that were possible.
4:31 PM ET, it begins with opening remarks.
The rest after the jump ...
Capt David Elder, Mr. Kenneth Peterson from USDA, Dr. Daniel McChesney from CVM at FDA, Dr. David Atchinson.
Capt Elder: Working closely with USDA on ag aspects. Notifed state authorities that swine fed adulterated product will not be approved, although risk of illness is low.
Recapping rice protein contamination.
The contaminants include melamine and related compounds, including cynauric acid (sp?). Says melamine is not that toxic, but may be in combo with other compounds.
Dr. Peterson: Animal feed was adulterated, so USDA cannot rule out possiblity food produced from these animals wouldn't be contaminated, so USDA can't approve this meat if it's produced for inspection. Will compensate farmers for swine that can't be sold, and USDA will help with "depopulation activities" and disposal of swine.
Capt Elder: Coordinating with state authorities. CA KS CN NY OK SC UT (might have missed one)
6000 hogs. Quarantined or being held in their states.
Feed mill in MO might also have rec'd contaminated feed.
Peterson: Pork will also be destroyed. In CA and UT, pork is bring retained at the plant. In SC, swine being held. Authorities are trying to find out if any meat has "entered commerce." If this has occurred, follow up action will be taken.
Capt Elder: If other producers are identified that fed contaminated feed, will be compensated.
Open to questions, said we must ask one only.
Marian Falco (?): Says people in CA HAVE consumed it. What is risk?
Dr. Peterson: We're investigating if any has "gone into commerce." Says as far as they know today, about 6000 hogs were potentially fed the feed. Has no reason to believe anywhere near that number is gone to slaughter.
In CA, does not involve a federal plant. Those products didn't go into "commerce," but were sold to customers. Doesn't know any that went from federal plants.
Elizabeth Weisse from USA Today: Can you be more specific in how cynauric acid is related to melamine, was it only found in the rice?
Dr. Elder: It's related to melamine, has been found in rice protein, some testing done on wheat gluten and in some samples, found there.
Andrew Bridges, AP: Does "not approved to enter the food supply" mean it's illegal to sell these hogs?
Peterson: Will be humanely euthanized. "Not eligible" to apply marks of inspection on these products. Sounds like he isn't saying it's "illegal" per se.
Richard Reed, the Oregonian: Interaction between melamine and cyauranic acid? What would the interaction do?
McChesney: Trying to figure that out. Might increase toxicity of melamine. Some indication the crystals form from combo of two compounds.
Pittsburg Post-Gazette: Asking about reimbursing for hogs - who being reimbursed?
Recapping how that works.
David Goldstein asked about pet food salvage being fed to livestock.
Dr. Elder: We are tracking all manufacturers of pet food. Practices differ as to what they sell as salvage products. Are tracing other pet foods made by Menu or anyone, made with wheat gluten, to see if have entered animal food supply.
Question: How certain are you these compounds ARE the culprit compounds? Latest estimates of affected pets.
McChesney: No additional info on compounds. Estimate on pets has not changed. Focused mainly on making sure all product is removed from commerce.
Follow up: Any other compounds?
Other metabolites of this family.
Gina Damron, Detroit Free Press: Ohio still have hog farm affected? Have all states quarantined?
Response: OK was just added today. Sounds like they removed the Ohio farm after investigation. Quarantine in some states, state or local "holds" in others.
Allison Aubrey (?) Did not ask.
Abigail Goldman, LA Times: Update us on where you are with the investigation in China? Do you have people in the factories? Please bring us up to date.
Murray Lumpkin: Have rec'd documents we need to get visas. People are ready to go over. We are working with Chinese authorities who have been in plants doing inspections. We know that our in-country colleagues have in-country expertise, and often having the original inspections done there gives us info that we can use when we go in. Expect to be in China, working with our counterparts, and doing our own inspections.
Alex Polaski, Oregonian: Asked McChesney about interaction of the mel and cyn acid, forms crystals? Lead to renal failure? Also, will USDA or government go after Wilbur Ellis for reimbursement.
Answer: Yes, crystals in kidneys can result in kidney failure.
Peterson: Compensation is for farmers. Will not compensate importer.
Polaski: Not question. Will gov'ment seek repayment of compensation from importer?
Peterson: No.
Question: How much money will be spent on compensation?
Answer: No.
Jim (?) WDI-TV In Detroit: Total number of pets killed or sustaining some sort of injury from pet food contamination?
McChesney: Confirmed 17-18. (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) We're not working on that.
Follow up: Will you ever take a count of dogs and cats involved?
McChesney: Don't know. Have had many thousands of calls. Are looking at it, but not sure we'll ever come up with a final number. Doesn't think we can ever get that.
Missed one question.
Reporter is asking about some swine where feed tested negative but urine tested positive. Does this mean this has been going on for a long time?
Elder: Contamination in food not homogeneous. He feels dates are clear. Can't speculate on "what you perceive as an inconsistency."
Daniel Goldstein, Bloomberg: Elaborate on Missouri feedmill. Any chance chemical got into chicken and cattle feed as well?
Answer: Not prepared to talk about that.
Goldstein: Can't rule out chicken and cattle feed?
McChesney: Can't rule out chicken, but BSE regulations would prevent this from going into cattle feed.
Debbye Turner, CBS News: Are you confident you have confiscated all contaminated pet food, will there be additional voluntary recalls in the next few days?
David Elder: Recall announced today involving Chenango Valley Foods for SmartPak (NOT TODAY), changed to say Tuesday. Now says there are additional products by Foster and Smith. (WE KNEW THIS.) We aren't aware of any additional recalls at this time. As we say time and again, the investigation is open. We continue to follow the trail. We don't expect anything esle to emerge, but we will follow the trail.
Dierdre Henderson: Is melamine truly the cause of the harm to these animals?
McChesney: We are considering other possibilities, but melamine is associated.
Question for Dr. Peterson: Has USDA rec'd indication from international trading partners that they might suspend US pork imports?
Peterson: No.
Chris Clayton: Why hasn't then been any US agencies putting hold or ban on imports until invesgitation is further along?
I'm sorry, I missed this response.
LA Times: Asked more about cyanuric (?) acid. Swimming pool chemical? How did it get into pet food? Byproduct of melamine?
McChesney: They don't know. Can say it's a nitrogen rich compound much like melamine. Either or both of those compounds in a protein product could serve to increase the apparent protein level. It's structurally similar to melamine. Probably added seperately not a breakdown product.
Question: Asked about dangers of eating the hogs to humans.
Atchinson: No melamine toxicity studies in humans. Working from rat studies. Indicate you need very high levels of pure melamine to cause a problem. Some mixtures may be more toxic. However, likelihood of human toxicity is low.
AP: Is depopulation mandatory?
Peterson: No.
Missed one question.
They apparently are not going to take my question, which was going to be:
American Nutrition has just confirmed for thepetfoodlist.com that some of Costco's Kirkland Signature pet foods are being recalled now, that melamine has been found in them, and that other foods may be involved. You said you weren't aware of any pending recalls - does that include this one? What is the likelihood there will be more?
They're done.
Go to the latest blog post | Go to the PetConnection home page
|Technorati Tags: pet food recall, dogs, cats,veterinarian, veterinary


Welcome to the hotel california
Such a lovely place
Such a lovely face
They livin’ it up at the hotel california
What a nice surprise, bring your alibis
Posted by: Steve | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
LOL Steve...
Posted by: Kim | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.
Posted by: Christie Keith | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Regarding McChesney - Every search I did says he's a PhD...nothing about DVM, not even on FDA's family tree seen here:
http://www.fda.gov/cvm/Documents/CVM1.pdf
Posted by: Barb | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Thanks, Barb.
Posted by: Christie Keith | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Daniel McChesney is listed on the FDA website CVM org chart(4/13/07) as PhD (no listing for dvm) - there are three others listed as PhD/DVM.
Posted by: Donna | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Hey Christie, is this press conference going to be televised? I've had CNN on all morning and haven't heard a word about it.
Posted by: Barb | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
My guess is that whoever put this together saw the Dr. and assume he was a vet, not realizing it implied PhD. He uses 'Dr'' quite often.
Posted by: Carole | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Daniel McChesney, Ph.D:
CVM, Office of Surveillance and ComplianceDirectorDaniel McChesney, Ph.D
Posted by: Shari Mann | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Christie - CHECK YOUR EMAIL for one from Therese!
Posted by: Kim | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
USDA will pay for food supply pigs, but not a penny for the other citizens impacted by this?
Shouldn't it be the feed companies that resold poisened food be the ones picking up the bills here?
Posted by: steve a | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
someone on another thread posted of a chicken soup pet lover food recall?! is there a way to check this? My daughters agility champion dogs are on that food. . . I'm sorta panicked. . . those dogs are her LIFE.
Posted by: Bj | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
At first China said We did not export wheat gluten to the United States, much less melamine tainted wheat gluten. Now it's China confirms exports to U.S. contained melamine
But that doesn't beat the epitomy of idiocy from the PFI Pet Food Industry Urges Federal Officials to Press Chinese Companies on Melamine-Tainted Exports or in other words please help us preserve our source of cheap raw materials from China.
Posted by: Frank | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Christie are you still watching this press conference? If so where?
Posted by: Maudigan | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Bj
Be sure to keep up with the Pet Food List.
It will tell you what's been recalled, and what hasn't.
There's a link to it in Gina's post above.
Posted by: Marcy | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
The Chicken Soup website still claims they are not involved in the recall.
"Wheat, wheat gluten, corn gluten meal, or rice protein concentrate is not used in any of our dry, canned or treat products."
Posted by: Sheila | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
"Jim (?) WDI-TV In Detroit: Total number of pets killed or sustaining some sort of injury from pet food contamination?
McChesney: Confirmed 17-18. (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) We’re not working on that."
Say WHAT?!!!
Words fail me.
*resumes head banging on desk*
Posted by: Ally | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Sheila
If I'm not mistaken, I don't think that any of Chicken Soup's products have been recalled...
but they did sell the rice protein concentrate to the hog farm in California.
Somebody correct me, if I'm wrong.
It's a lot to keep up with!!!
Posted by: Marcy | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
(I just posted on the Costco Thread - beware of milk formula for kittens and puppies many have been recalled - they contain the tainted gluten and protein - the codes a listed on the Costco pulls thread - the companies are trying to hide this)
Posted by: Issy | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
is there a url for this?
Posted by: starr | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Marcy, you are correct they have not been recalled. I was posting that info. for BJ, I believe it was that asked about the Chicken Soup. I feed it to my dogs, so I am trying to keep up with them, too! :) sigh!
Posted by: Sheila | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
We have two days to make our pets count.
Now or never.
Put up or shut up.
Yadda yadda, rah rah,
The list we put up is the list we are doing,
no discussion, it is a done deal.
Got a hot idea for the next list, get to itchmo forums AFTER you do some work on this blitz.
Let the FDA muddle on as they will, just get the blitz info out there.
Posted by: E. Hamilton | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Issy, can you give me some more info about the milk formula? I need to know: someone I know is using milk formula for kittens. Links, sites, anything. Thanks
Posted by: Krystal | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
I "hear" you Sheila...
I bought a bag of the Chicken Soup for my kitties...and haven't opened it yet. Afraid to.
I am feeding Drs. Foster and Smith dry (the regular adult formula), and just dodged the "bullet" yesterday.
My babies seem fine on it, so I'm really nervous about changing to anything else right now. When this situation gets more stable, I may change or add something else though.
Until then, I figure it's 'stick with what you're doing.'
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Sigh...
Posted by: Marcy | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
CN and OK? Connecticut and Oklahoma? Those are new!
Posted by: Kim | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
They keep talking about 'pure' melamine, but remember way back when the first China company was being 'investigated' and someone found that they had been placing ads in some trade site that they will buy 'all scrap melamine'? This implies, to my mind, that pure melamine is not even close to what was added to the gluten. The scrap could have come from anywhere from the production of anything... so why keep talking about 'pure' melamine? It's just as unbelievable as '16 pets'.
Posted by: Cynthia | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
"They" knew the risks.
http://tinyurl.com/ypf7fd
Posted by: Steve | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Thank you once again, Christie, for an amazing job keeping everyone in the loop on this. You truly do rock.
Posted by: Laura | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
"Reporter is asking about some swine where feed tested negative but urine tested positive. Does this mean this has been going on for a long time?
Elder: Contamination in food not homogeneous. He feels dates are clear. Can’t speculate on “what you perceive as an inconsistency.”
Daniel Goldstein, Bloomberg: Elaborate on Missouri feedmill. Any chance chemical got into chicken and cattle feed as well?
Answer: Not prepared to talk about that.
Goldstein: Can’t rule out chicken and cattle feed?
McChesney: Can’t rule out chicken, but BSE regulations would prevent this from going into cattle feed."
Not prepared to talk about chicken??!!
Posted by: Kim | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
The danger to humans is low the FDA says?
And they have it all under control?
No more recalls expected, where have I heard that before?
I believe only one thing about that press conference.
They are not working on the pet deaths.
THAT I believe.
Posted by: E. Hamilton | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
nice find Steve. So why why why why are American food related companies begging for mass poisonings by buying so many ingredients from China??? I would say that we should be testing all shipments from China but how do you test for every conceivable way of poisoning food? Not possible. Do what Japan did and cut China off from agricultural shipments. Kool Aid anyone?
Posted by: Cynthia | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
It sounds as if the FDA is not particularly concerned about the numbers (no surprise there!). That being the case, does it *have* to be the FDA that collects that information and tracks the numbers? Maybe it isn't so important that the FDA do it, but that some reputable organization do it. I know there has been talk about establishing a new organization within the veterinary community for this purpose, but that will take time and most likely won't happen soon enough to deal with the crisis we have right now. Why can't an existing organization start collecting the data and track the results? Like, maybe the AVMA? Any other possiblities?
Posted by: Marilyn | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Thank you so much Christie, you are our hero!
Posted by: Sandi K | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Starr,
I confirmed recall on the phone. They are not announcing it publically and they do not have the recall listed on their website. I posted about my conversation on the Costco thread.
Posted by: Izzy | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
About the possibility cyanuric acid was added separately:
http://tinyurl.com/3d64ms
It’s an old paper, but it could easily be how melamine is being made in China today. Cyanuric acid, ammelide and ammeline are all intermediate products in the synthesis of melamine from urea, and it would be no surprise to find them a bad batch (not useful for plastic forks) of melamine.
Posted by: Carol PW | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
McChesney: "Confirmed 17-18. We’re not working on that.”
Is he referring to the 17-18 animals Menu Foods killed in their lab testing the food they thought was a problem back in February and tried to cover up?
Wasn't that how it went?
Posted by: Steve | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
JOINT NEWS RELEASE: FDA and USDA Determine Swine Fed Adulterated Product
USDA to Compensate for Depopulation
WASHINGTON, April 26, 2007 -- The USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today notified State authorities that swine fed adulterated product will not be approved to enter the food supply. Based on information currently available, FDA and USDA believe the likelihood of illness after eating pork from swine fed the adulterated product would be very low; however, the agencies believe it is prudent to take this measure.
FDA determined that a shipment of rice protein imported from China was contaminated with melamine and melamine-related compounds. The product was imported during the week of April 2, 2007 by Wilbur-Ellis, an importer and distributor of agricultural products. The rice protein was used in the production of pet food and a byproduct was used to produce animal feed.
The contaminants in question include melamine and melamine-related compounds, including cyanuric acid, the combination of which is a potential source of concern in relation to human and animal health. Scientific research indicates that melamine alone, at detected levels, is not a human health concern. However, no scientific data exist to ascertain the effects of combining melamine and melamine-related compounds. Therefore, a determination has not yet been made regarding the safety of the product.
Because the animal feed in question was adulterated, USDA cannot rule out the possibility that food produced from animals fed this product could also be adulterated. Therefore, USDA cannot place the mark of inspection on food produced from these animals.
USDA is offering to compensate producers who euthanize swine that were fed the adulterated product. USDA is authorized to use Section 32 funds to restore farmers' purchasing power. USDA is also offering the expertise and assistance of Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) personnel in carrying out depopulation activities, to ensure animals are euthanized and disposed of in accordance with Federal and State laws.
FDA and FSIS are coordinating with State authorities in eight states where the adulterated feed is known to have been purchased. Eight pork producers in the states of California, Kansas, North Carolina, New York, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah are known to have purchased the feed. These combined operations involve approximately 6,000 hogs. All of the animals are currently being held under state quarantines in CA, NC, NY and SC. In KS, OK and UT producers agreed to hold the animals until further notice. Authorities are also in contact with a feed mill in Missouri that might have received adulterated feed.
Pork and pork products derived from animals that were fed the adulterated product will also be destroyed. In CA and UT, pork from federally inspected plants is being held under FSIS direction. In SC, a state inspected plant is voluntarily holding swine that were fed the adulterated product. FSIS, FDA and state authorities are in the process of determining whether any meat from animals that were fed the adulterated product has entered commerce. If that has occurred, FSIS will work with states and industry to take the appropriate action.
FDA and FSIS are continuing the effort to trace the adulterated feed. If additional producers are identified who fed the adulterated product to animals, they will also be offered compensation by USDA for depopulation and disposal.
Posted by: Eva | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Marilyn has a good point. Petconnection.com has been collecting data regarding impacted pets - why is this data not being considered? Has it been shared with anyone? There are two major points I don't understand in this situation - 1) why is there no system for immediate notification to all vets regarding a crisis of this nature and 2) it cannot be that difficult to have some type of reporting system set up, even on an immediate, crisis basis. I would think state vet associations have contact info for most vets in the state. I worked for a Fortune 500 corporation during a major recall - you may not have a staff waiting to handle something like this, but it does not take long to put something together and take action.
Posted by: Donna | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Comment by Eva — April 26, 2007 @ 2:54 pm
Well how you like that the USDA is going to help the bigger businesses and let us Pet Owners fend for ourselves.
Is the Pet Food Industry going to Compensate Pet Owners for Depopulation?
Does the FDA remember what this is all about?
Posted by: Steve | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Comment by Steve,
Exactly.
Posted by: Eva | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Check out this catch Katiekat hauled in.
http://www.supplychain.cn/en/art/?1506
http://tinyurl.com/267ewf
http://www.supplychain.cn/en/art/?1522
http://tinyurl.com/2by3l6
http://tinyurl.com/2xl8qj
Posted by: Steve | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
"I believe only one thing about that press conference.They are not working on the pet deaths.THAT I believe."---Comment by E. Hamilton — April 26, 2007 @ 2:39 pm
It's the FDA giving the update, not the ASPCA. Where is there a federal agency that protects pets? It's time.
Posted by: Nadine Long | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
I have a feeling this has been going on for some time and just came to a head as so many animals got sick. I sold a puppy to a couple about 12 years ago, and they called me recently to say she inexplicably developed acute renal failure, almost overnight...in OCTOBER 2006! This breed is very healthy..I have NEVER heard of a dog this age developing renal failure for no known reason. I know all the dogs in her bloodline and litter mates and still stay in touch. Her grandfather lived to 17 and mother to 15. She is the only sick dog. Eating Sensible Choice, I believe. Who knows what has been added to our food supply in the past and we just accepted that our animals somehow became ill. This is just the tip of the iceberg and not the first time, I am certain.
Posted by: Sandra | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Thanks for liveblogging again Christie! You must have the fastest fingers west of the Missippi!
Posted by: cardima | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Ally, E. Hamilton, et al,
Just saw this on Consumer Affairs:
My Pet Counts! Postcard Blitz
Meanwhile, pet owners who've lost a dog or cat because of the contaminated foods are encouraged to voice their concerns in the nationwide "My Pet Counts! Postcard Blitz."
Pet owners are asked to make a post card with a picture of their deceased dog or cat -- and a brief message about their loss -- and mail it this Saturday (April 28) to the following governmental and media representatives:
Marcia K. Larkins, D.V.M
FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine
Ombudsman
7519 Standish Place HFV-7
Rockville, MD 20855
Senator Richard Durbin
309 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Your state's U.S. Senators (http://www.senate.gov)
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Organizers say they want the event to "demonstrate the full scope of this pet food recall disaster.
"The FDA continues to publicize only '16 confirmed deaths,'" organizers say. "Reliable sources report that the number of pet deaths are and will be much higher -- most likely in the thousands. By sticking to the 'only 16 confirmed deaths' wording, this disaster is being grossly minimized. The word must get out."
National March
The postcard blitz coincides with Saturday's national march by the group Pets Need A Voice Too.
Founder Jen Hoeflein of Bastrop, Texas, organized Saturday's "Keep Our Pets Safe" march to memorialize pets that have died in the wake of the recall and draw attention to what she calls "an outrageous situation."
"The march is a direct response from people all over the country and Canada who felt an overwhelming need to speak in outrage over the lack of safety standards in regard to pet food and the corporate negligence in allowing the food to remain on the shelves prior to the recall," Hoeflein told ConsumerAffairs.Com.
The march is planned for 10 a.m. this Saturday in several cities across the country, including Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Dallas and San Diego.
Hoeflein founded the group after losing her three-year-old cat, Timber last November to liver failure.
Posted by: Eva | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
If a dog developed renal failure months ago, would the melamine still be in the tissue or urine? To be tested? She is still alive but being hydrated twice daily to keep her alive.
Posted by: Sandra | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
I would like to offer my SINCERE THANKS to Christie, Gina, Dr. Becker, and everyone at Petconnection for this wonderful website. This site is a wealth of information and is the best place I have found to keep informed and up-to-date regarding the tragic pet food recall. Thanks again for all of your tireless hard work over the past 6 weeks, I really appreciate it.
Posted by: catlover | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Comment by Sandra — April 26, 2007 @ 3:11 pm
I am in total agreement with you. My hope is that as the news of the toxic pet food really penetrates the population, it will ring a bell and more will come forward with their complaints of earlier cases of unexplained renal failure.
Posted by: Nadine Long | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Comment by Sandra — April 26, 2007 @ 3:16 pm
Have the vet contact UC Davis.
Posted by: Nadine Long | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM
Sandra,
I saw in several stories that UC Davis is working on testing tissues for melamine (related to the pork issue) but you could call and see if they could extend the testing to pets as well.
Posted by: Eva | 25 April 2007 at 08:00 PM